According to me, I'm actually 9 weeks and 3 days. After all I have a 5 week cycle, but we have the scan on Monday which will confirm everything (hurrah!) and I no longer have to write these posts in secret!! ;)
Tell you what though, you'd think that as you got nearer the end of the first trimester things would alleviate but my lord this week has already been a killer! I. Am. Exhausted.
To the point where I started to think 'hmm..maybe this isn't all baby'. Maybe there's something brewing here.
I had not even a whiff of a relapse last time while I was pregnant so I would be a bit shocked if it does occur. After all, being preggers seems to help so many day to day symptoms. I suppose if it's gonna happen though, it'll happen. Of course last time was really a whole different ball game.
By this point while pregnant with Lib, I had just finished work with severance pay, so I could sit back, be 'pregnant' and listen to my body. Though I'm in a position to get more rest than most when having their second child, I struggle to relax in the same way as before...understandably! So I think this awful fatigue/exhaustion is probably a combination of things.
However, if I wasn't pregnant, and felt like this I would automatically think 'relapse' and rest up for a couple of days in the hope that it subsides. Why am I incapable if making those decisions now that I'm pregnant? After all, in lots of ways it's more important that I do that now because I can guarantee that they will be reluctant to put me on steroids if I do gave a major relapse.
I have a weird, almost punishing, outlook whereby I think 'well..I asked for this. We didn't have to get pregnant', so why should I get extra help? I'm an idiot. And I know many people who read this will agree.
I will try harder to be a bit more.....kind to myself. I promise.
Talking of relapses though, I did a bit if MS research today (like to be do it occasionally, thought this time it was looking into relapses when pregnant) and when reading I read this:
"A relapse is defined by "the appearance of new symptoms, or the return of old symptoms, for a period of 24 hours or more – in the absence of a change in core body temperature or infection"
Now it's been 13 years since I was diagnosed and I have NEVER read (or never properly taken it on board, perhaps) that it is classed as a relapse if symptoms have been present for more than 24 hours.
If that is the case then my lord, I think I have had a LOT more relapses than I first thought. I always think of them as blips. If I have a 'blip' I used to rest for a good few days and they subside/go away, so I always assumed it wasn't one. However, last time I was put on steroids my consultant did say you would get better without them it just speeds up the process.
So all those times I thought 'no it can't be a relapse I can still use my legs (!)' it is likely it was, but just not a major one. In which case maybe I should have been alerting the hospital of these? I got the impression that if it wasn't bad enough for steroids then it wasn't a proper relapse. I tend to only give them a ring when my legs/speech etc stop working. So pretty late in the day!!
Is this a new development in the treatment/management of MS, I wonder?
Every relapse is damage being done, so maybe I'm not as stable as I first believed? I haven't had an MRI for about 6 years so really they have no idea what's going on in that brain of mine.
I have an appointment in a few weeks, so I think I'll have to bring all this up to hopefully put my mind at rest.
My further tales of MS, motherhood, bipolar and so much more can now be found at
Click on the link to check it out and subscribe!
Chloe
No comments:
Post a Comment